My Video of the March 2, 2012, Henryville Tornado

Since I already have a blog dedicated to storm chasing (and jazz saxophone), I purposely don’t post a lot of severe-weatherly articles in Fox’s World. Still, this fox ranges far and wide and occasionally finds a meteorological morsel too compelling to ignore, and that’s how it is here.

I’ve already provided an extensive writeup on my intercept of the devastating EF-4 Henryville, Indiana, tornado, in my Stormhorn blog, so I’m not going to say much about it here. I’ll just mention that it was the worst storm in the record-breaking March 2, 2012, outbreak, and I thought you might take an interest in the video I shot as the tornado formed and intensified near Palmyra. Here it is.

Posted in Current Events, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on My Video of the March 2, 2012, Henryville Tornado

Copywriting Quick-Tip: Give Adjectives and Adverbs a Break

Poor modifiers! Overworked and underpaid, that’s what they are, constantly making up for other parts of grammar that fail to pull their weight.

Look, I’m not priggish when it comes to adjectives and adverbs. I use them constantly (see?). But I try to do so judiciously, because like many writers, I tend to go overboard with descriptors. The result is not good writing. Good writing projects clarity, color, and mood economically, whereas packing a string of adjectives in front of a single, claustrophobic noun produces mere purple prose.

So why not give adjectives and adverbs a break by putting lazy nouns and verbs to work. Here are three pointers that can help you add energy to your writing by subtracting unnecessary modifiers.

1. Use a colorful noun or verb that can stand on its own.

For example, consider this sentence:

He drove very fast down the highway.

Is that really the best we can do? We’ve got an adverb, fast, describing the verb drove; we’ve got another adverb, very, modifying the first one; and the result of this partnership is ho-hum. But what if we lose the modifiers and trade drove for something more compelling?

He tore down the highway.

Or, if that’s too dramatic:

He sped down the highway.

Now we’ve got a verb that can earn its keep while fast and very take ten in the break room. We’ve also got a more dynamic sentence.

2. Eliminate redundancy.

Ask yourself whether what you’ve written is saying the same thing twice.

She raced swiftly down the track.

Does she sometimes race slowly? Since the verb race implies speed, swiftly is useless repetition. Let’s get rid of it. “She raced down the track”: that’s better, don’t you agree?

Here’s a somewhat different example:

He was revered as a wise and sagacious old man.

Sagacious–what a great word! But if we want to use it, then we really need to do away with wise, because that’s what sagacious means: wise. And doesn’t it sound weird to say that the old man was wise and wise? Let’s just state it this way …

He was revered as a sagacious old man …

and leave it at that.

For that matter, we might even apply pointer number-one, thus:

He was revered as a sage.

3. When you’ve got several adjectives or adverbs in a sentence, ask yourself which ones you can cut.

If you had to pay five dollars for every modifier you used, which ones would you trim away? Be hard on yourself. You may decide that every adjective or adverb merits the price. But you may also be surprised at how many of them serve no purpose, and you’ll like the results when you excise them.

Bottom line: Use modifiers thoughtfully and be able to justify each one. A colorful noun or verb may serve you better.

 

 

Posted in Copywriting, Style and Grammar | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Copywriting Quick-Tip: Give Adjectives and Adverbs a Break

To Thole or Not to Thole

Did you know that thole is a word?

Me neither until this morning, when my sweetheart, Lisa, who is a self-proclaimed word nerd, emailed me Merriam-Webster’s “Word of the Day.”

There it was: thole. “Well, that’s interesting,” I thought, but I overstated the matter. Thole is interesting the way that farina is interesting, possessing much the same personality.

Thole begins well as a pronunciation, but it falls flat at its definition. With its high-sounding Medieval lilt, thole is the kind of word you’d expect to perhaps refer to a Celtic bard, or some vital part of a knight’s armor, or a high-ranking official in a king’s court: “Lords and ladies, presenting his worship, Sir Edward Lockshire, Thole of Camelot.”

Thole means none of those things. In fact, thole isn’t a thing at all. Thole is a verb, not a noun.* You don’t see a thole, admire a thole, wish you had a thole, or even feel indifferent about a thole. You simply thole. Or maybe you don’t thole, depending. If you’ve made it this far into this article, I’d say that you thole quite splendidly.

Shall I tell you the definition of thole? Yes, if I wish you to refrain from wringing my neck. Thole means endure. Got that? When you thole adverse circumstances, you endure them.

Now, doesn’t that just suck in every way possible. Seriously. See for yourself. Go ahead and try substituting thole for endure in any sentence you please, and then you tell me whether the result satisfies.

“Come, let us thole.”

“The journey is long and hard, but I shall thole.”

“I thought you would thole, but you didn’t thole at all–wimp!”

Past tense is worse yet. Slapping an -ed on the end of the word sounds just plain weird:

“I thought you tholed, but now I think that thole ithn’t in your vocabulary. I mean, isn’t. Thole isn’t in your vocabulary.”

Good thing it’s not, that’s what I say. If we must endure, we’d prefer to do so without lisping.

When you need to convey a concept that smacks of character, such as endurance, you need a word with enough personality to do the job right, and thole isn’t it. Nothing about it fits, not even the noun you could extrapolate from it. From endure you get endurance; does it follow, then, that thole gives you tholance?

Fortunately, no. Looking in the dictionary, I find one small ray of sunshine in whose warmth we can bask: there is no tholance. Those of you who fancy yourselves tholant, put it away. There’s no such word.

But getting back to the need for a word’s personality to match its character, open your thesaurus and you’ll find a whole list of colorful and useful synonyms for endure: Survive. Gut it out. Persist. Brave. Push through. Bear. Undergo. Withstand. Sustain. All good words, very good–words with grit and muscle, and there are more where they came from. In contrast, switching out endure for thole is like replacing Mike Tyson with Woody Allen: neither substitute packs the punch it needs.

For all of the above reasons and others besides, you will not catch me using the word thole in my writing. It simply fails to convince.

So what do you think of all this?

That’s what you think? Well, in fact, no, I really do not have way too much time on my hands. I just felt compelled to write. In this life, some matters are of such grave importance that they require comment. This is not one of them, but I have commented anyway. Now I’m finished, and you can get on with the rest of your day. Thank you for tholing this post to the very end.

__________________

* Okay, I have to recant. A second look in the dictionary reveals that thole is also a noun. According to Webster’s, the noun form of thole refers to “either of a pair of pins set in the gunwale of a boat to hold an oar in place.” This definition of thole I can handle, though its usefulness is limited. Among the world’s least-asked questions, “Who’s bringing the tholes?” has got to be near the top of the list.


Posted in Copywriting, Funny and Weird Stuff, Style and Grammar, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | 7 Comments